From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
Received: from mengyan1223.wang (mengyan1223.wang [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E864F385B836;
 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E864F385B836
Received: from [IPv6:240e:35a:10a1:4e00:dc73:854d:832e:2] (unknown
 [IPv6:240e:35a:10a1:4e00:dc73:854d:832e:2])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest
 SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@mengyan1223.wang)
 by mengyan1223.wang (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E413E65EEC;
 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:06:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <1ecb8e9ec2fcc7c27aca83f65ffa2fc0f6288754.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Subject: committed: [PATCH] mips: add MSA vec_cmp and vec_cmpu expand
 pattern [PR101132]
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
To: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Cc: marxin@gcc.gnu.org, Matthew Fortune <mfortune@gmail.com>, 
 gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:06:30 +0800
In-Reply-To: <c083490ff12c7d5b819193a17c559c19a56263f2.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
References: <1c61137b2e714a8a45e2b078a79851acc2eb5b8c.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <4bd3eabc82dd007b1ed684aa2f1f720918740986.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <mptczr0i5w7.fsf@arm.com>
 <c083490ff12c7d5b819193a17c559c19a56263f2.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3033.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:06:45 -0000

On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 16:17 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 09:04 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> writes:
> > > Ping again.
> > 
> > Sorry that this has gone unreviewed for so long.  I think in
> > practice
> > the MIPS port is essentially unmaintained at this point -- it would
> > be great if someone would volunteer :-)
> 
> A company working on MIPS has contacted me and said one of their
> employees may contact the SC and take the role of MIPS maintainer. 
> Not
> sure their progress though.
> 
> > It isn't really appropriate for me to review MIPS stuff given that I
> > work
> > for a company that has a competing architecture.  I think Jeff
> > expressed
> > similar concerns given his new role.
> 
> > That said, the patch looks clearly correct to me, so please go ahead
> > and apply (to trunk and GCC 11).  Thanks for your patience.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> It has been 5 weeks so it's better to rebase and bootstrap & test it
> again.  I'll commit it if there is no regression.

Committed to master at 45cb789e and releases/gcc-11 at 2a47ee78.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University