From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, egcs-bugs@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: VAX Ultrix bootstrap failure with gcc-2.96
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:37:00 -0000
Message-id: <20000524113723.Q3314@wolery.cumb.org>
References: <no.id> <200005241725.NAA10242@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
X-SW-Source: 2000-05/msg01387.html

On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:25:09PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > cc1: Invalid option `-Wno-long-long'
> > In file included from ../../gcc/cppmain.c:25:
> > ../../gcc/cpplib.h:189: warning: ANSI C does not support `long long'
> 
> After several false starts, I think the following patch is a reasonable
> approach to fixing the problem.  The definition of the warning CFLAGS
> for stage 1 and 2 is moved to configure.  The configure code could be
> easily modified to support more option tests if that is needed at some
> point in the future.

You might want to turn off -pedantic if -Wno-long-long is not
available, since you will get floods of warnings about long long
otherwise.

Could you move the definition of LOOSE_CFLAGS into configure as well?
This would reduce the number of times sed is executed during the
build.

zw