From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (John David Anglin)
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault building libg++ without named returns
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 23:06:00 -0000
Message-id: <200009090606.CAA28664@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
References: <200009090014.UAA25224@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
X-SW-Source: 2000-09/msg00312.html

> The tFix test fails.  Not sure what is going on here but for most of the
> other classes there seems to be weak definitions for the class constructors,
> etc.  Here is the log:

The failure doesn't occur under hpux 10.20 (only i686 linux).  As noted
before, there aren't any weak symbol defines in Fix.o when built under
i686 linux.  For example,

hpux:
         U strstreambuf::~strstreambuf(void)
00000000 W Fix::~Fix(void)
4000000c D Fix::Rep_0
40000014 D Fix::Rep_m1

linux:
         U strstreambuf::~strstreambuf(void)
0000000c D Fix::Rep_0
00000014 D Fix::Rep_m1

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)