From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ovidiu Predescu <ovidiu@cup.hp.com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches 
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 14:26:00 -0000
Message-id: <200104022126.OAA03375@orion.nsr.hp.com>
References: <15048.58274.348291.327516@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00074.html

On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 22:40:02 +0200 (MEST), Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:

> The following patches have not been reviewed for about a month:
> 
> [...]
> 
> [Solaris 8] libobjc and objc test patches
> 
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg00125.html
> 
> These patches are required to successfully link and test Objective C
> programs on Solaris.

The patches look OK. However can you explain why is this needed?

Index: gcc/objc/objc-act.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/objc/objc-act.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66.2.1
diff -u -p -r1.66.2.1 objc-act.c
--- objc-act.c  2001/02/16 09:19:08     1.66.2.1
+++ objc-act.c  2001/03/02 23:08:30
@@ -8237,7 +8237,9 @@ finish_objc ()
 
   for (chain = cls_ref_chain; chain; chain = TREE_CHAIN (chain))
     {
+#if 0
       handle_class_ref (chain);
+#endif
       if (TREE_PURPOSE (chain))
        generate_classref_translation_entry (chain);
     }


Thanks,
Ovidiu