From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23755 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 20:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23743 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 20:50:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2002 20:50:10 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id g48Ko6FN018961; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:50:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) id g48Ko57e018960; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:50:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200205082050.g48Ko57e018960@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checking version of rtl flag access macros To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (John David Anglin) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 13:54:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: janis187@us.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: from "John David Anglin" at May 8, 2002 04:36:53 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00793.txt.bz2 > I think that using RTL_FLAG_CHECKn is wrong. It's not an error > if the rtx is not a JUMP_INSN or a CALL_INSN. However, the result In looking at dbr_schedule, I see that INSN_ANNULLED_BRANCH_P and INSN_FROM_TARGET_P apply to any active insn. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)