From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7553 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 15:36:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7545 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 15:36:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 15:36:34 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id QAA06717; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:36:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma006325; Mon, 15 Jul 02 16:36:08 +0100 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2 [172.16.1.91]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20775; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:36:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19456; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:36:07 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200207151536.QAA19456@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> To: jeroen dobbelaere cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Fix arm-linux bootstrap problem on cvs. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:29:44 +0200." <3D32EA68.1080109@acunia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 08:47:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00678.txt.bz2 > Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >>- I also did a bootstrap and testsuite for c,c++ on this CVS version with and > >> without the patch. > >> > >> Results can be found here : > >> > >> > >> and > >> > >> > >>Diff-ing those two results only shows differences in paths, not in testresults. > >> > >>So I guess that this patch can be safely applied in order to enable cvs builds > >>with checking enabled. > > > > > > Yep, thanks for your patience. Please install. > > > > I don't have write access to the tree. > Can someone who does install it ? > Ah! Ok, I'll handle it. Do you have a copyright assignment in place? I don't think we need one for this change, after all each change is effectively to just one line and there are only two such changes, but it would be important to have one in place if you are to contribute regularly. R.