From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32403 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2002 16:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32396 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2002 16:33:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.123) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2002 16:33:51 -0000 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 4018) id A25824FC7B; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:33:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:34:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Richard Henderson , Jan Hubicka , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: cprop "fix" Message-ID: <20020717163352.GG9922@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20020713184902.GD1909@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20020717091651.A14260@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020717091651.A14260@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00892.txt.bz2 > On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:49:02PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > The attached patch "fixes" our cprop implementation by adding the local > > counterpart that is really easy given the infrastructure we developed. > > Makes sense, generally. > > Your implementation does not terminate building unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c > on alpha though. Can I get the preprocessed file? It should be the case that try_repalace_reg is still returning false positives. It is related to apply_change group stuff we've discussed. I believe we can simply add num_pending_changes () function to make this stuff easier. Sounds sane? Honza > > > r~