From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31014 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 21:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31007 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 21:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO egil.codesourcery.com) (66.92.14.122) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 21:56:59 -0000 Received: from zack by egil.codesourcery.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17YD50-00010H-00; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:56:58 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:35:00 -0000 From: Zack Weinberg To: Richard Henderson , Richard Sandiford , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: RFC/RFA: Improve definition of ASM_OUTPUT_MEASURED_SIZE Message-ID: <20020726215658.GC9666@codesourcery.com> References: <20020726002049.GD760@codesourcery.com> <20020725185339.C27268@redhat.com> <20020726053048.GA16614@codesourcery.com> <20020726110754.B27642@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020726110754.B27642@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg01594.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:07:54AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:46:37AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > The irix headers define their own ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_SIZE, > > probably because it doesn't seem to like the old form either: > > Ah, right. The function size gets set via the ".end" directive. > > > as: Error: /foo.s, line 7: Symbol must have absolute value: s > > Since neither form works on Irix, I guess defaulting to .-foo > is fine, since Irix won't be using the macro at all. Are there any other potentially problematic platforms, or can I go ahead and check the patch in? zw