* libiberty: Unused macro.
@ 2002-07-26 9:27 Neil Booth
2002-07-29 10:21 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neil Booth @ 2002-07-26 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: DJ Delorie
Since libiberty is quite different in scope to GCC, I'm ignoring
Mark's blanket approval.
OK for this? (Bootstrapped etc., of course).
Neil.
* cplus-dem.c (PREPEND_BLANK): Remove.
Index: libiberty/cplus-dem.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libiberty/cplus-dem.c,v
retrieving revision 1.85
diff -u -p -r1.85 cplus-dem.c
--- libiberty/cplus-dem.c 19 Feb 2002 20:02:12 -0000 1.85
+++ libiberty/cplus-dem.c 26 Jul 2002 16:13:00 -0000
@@ -305,8 +305,6 @@ const struct demangler_engine libiberty_
};
#define STRING_EMPTY(str) ((str) -> b == (str) -> p)
-#define PREPEND_BLANK(str) {if (!STRING_EMPTY(str)) \
- string_prepend(str, " ");}
#define APPEND_BLANK(str) {if (!STRING_EMPTY(str)) \
string_append(str, " ");}
#define LEN_STRING(str) ( (STRING_EMPTY(str))?0:((str)->p - (str)->b))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: libiberty: Unused macro.
2002-07-26 9:27 libiberty: Unused macro Neil Booth
@ 2002-07-29 10:21 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-07-29 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neil; +Cc: gcc-patches
> Since libiberty is quite different in scope to GCC, I'm ignoring
> Mark's blanket approval.
>
> OK for this? (Bootstrapped etc., of course).
That's fine. It's exposed interfaces that I'm most concerned about.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-29 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-26 9:27 libiberty: Unused macro Neil Booth
2002-07-29 10:21 ` DJ Delorie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).