From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-65308-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19149 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2002 10:57:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19119 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 10:57:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 10:57:29 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id LAA09572; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:57:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma008484; Thu, 1 Aug 02 11:56:18 +0100
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2 [172.16.1.91])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04528;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:56:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08898;
	Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200208011056.LAA08898@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
        John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: RFC: New approach to --with-cpu 
In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Aug 2002 11:30:47 BST."
             <wvnheieeuqw.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 03:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > +#ifdef TARGET_DEFAULT_OPTION_CPU
> > +  if (TARGET_DEFAULT_CPU_P ())
> > +    add_option (argcp, argvp, "-mcpu=" XSTRING (TARGET_DEFAULT_OPTION_CPU));
> > +#endif
> 
> Sorry, didn't notice first time.  Is it OK to use string
> concatenation in gcc.c?

No, I don't think so. It isn't available (that way) in K+R C.

R.