From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9762 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2002 01:57:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9755 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 01:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 01:57:18 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g7M1uoF17510; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:56:50 -0400 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g7M1unV196580; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:56:49 -0400 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id VAA27954; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:56:49 -0400 Message-Id: <200208220156.VAA27954@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: Alan Modra cc: Geoff Keating , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerPC select_section / unique_section In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Modra of "Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:22:15 +0930." <20020822112215.Q21053@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 18:59:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01334.txt.bz2 >>>>> Alan Modra writes: Alan> Why not use decl_readonly_section? Alan> Similarly for the other functions. I've used this on gcc-3.2 based Alan> powerpc64-linux for a couple of weeks. Patch available on request. As I replied to Franz, testing flag_pic is not sufficient for PPC64. Any patch using the varasm.c default functions without further changes is wrong. David