From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-66639-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Received: (qmail 15129 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2002 02:07:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15122 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 02:07:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw3.watson.ibm.com) (198.81.209.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 02:07:30 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw3.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g7M27EF07732; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:07:14 -0400 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g7M27EV91100; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:07:14 -0400 Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3/01-10-2000) with ESMTP id WAA08682; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:07:13 -0400 Message-Id: <200208220207.WAA08682@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> cc: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>, Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerPC select_section / unique_section In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> of "Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:29:31 +0930." <20020822112931.R21053@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:19:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01337.txt.bz2 >>>>> Alan Modra writes: Alan> Ouch. Forget my suggestion re decl_readonly_section. Hmm, would Alan> you accept a patch that cleans up flag_pic in rs6000.c? ie. has Alan> flag_pic always set for ABI_AIX? Have you actually tried that? flag_pic interferes with ABI_AIX TOC register usage. ABI_AIX does not use the flag_pic machinery. Now that I have fixed the ASM_GLOBALIZE_LABEL breakage, I am going to get back to testing the select_section patch for GCC 3.2 and GCC 3.3. We can look at cleaning up select_section and unique_section for GCC 3.4, but it's too late for GCC 3.2 and GCC 3.3. I only am modifying the current form of those functions enough to fix bugs. David