From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>,
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>,
Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerPC select_section / unique_section
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 08:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020904152843.GA9505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200209040509.BAA21206@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:09:58AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Richard> I'm not fond of the ifdef. A boolean on the target structure
> Richard> would be better IMO.
>
> Okay, but what concerns me is the overlap between
> targetm.in_small_data_p and the new targetm.readonly_small_data_p. The
> logic will be split between those two, nested functions which will
> interact in complicated and potentially confusing ways.
Err, no, that's not what I mean. A boolean field (not function)
that says whether small data continues to be read only as well.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-22 13:01 David Edelsohn
2002-08-29 18:26 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-03 21:15 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-03 21:51 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-03 22:10 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-04 8:28 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2002-09-04 9:40 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-04 10:23 ` Richard Henderson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-21 11:09 David Edelsohn
2002-08-21 11:21 ` Franz Sirl
2002-08-21 11:29 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-21 12:01 ` Franz Sirl
2002-08-21 12:15 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-29 18:01 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-21 19:02 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-21 19:19 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-21 19:25 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-21 21:28 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-29 18:19 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-29 18:03 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-30 7:15 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-30 8:27 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-30 8:42 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-30 11:17 ` Franz Sirl
2002-08-30 11:26 ` Franz Sirl
2002-08-30 11:29 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-30 17:32 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-30 18:17 ` Richard Henderson
2002-08-30 18:48 ` Geoff Keating
2002-09-02 15:41 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-02 16:32 ` Alan Modra
2002-09-02 16:51 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-02 17:13 ` Alan Modra
2002-09-02 17:57 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-02 18:27 ` Alan Modra
2002-09-02 18:49 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-02 19:41 ` Alan Modra
2002-09-02 19:59 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-02 20:17 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-02 20:11 ` Jeff Sturm
2002-09-02 20:19 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-03 0:16 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-03 8:22 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-03 9:04 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-03 10:40 ` David Edelsohn
2002-09-03 13:44 ` Richard Henderson
2002-09-03 9:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-09-03 8:41 ` Geoff Keating
2002-09-03 9:50 ` David Edelsohn
2002-08-21 18:54 ` Alan Modra
2002-08-21 18:59 ` David Edelsohn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020904152843.GA9505@redhat.com \
--to=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com \
--cc=amodra@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=dje@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=geoffk@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).