From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19995 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2002 02:54:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19986 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2002 02:54:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cts04.webone.com.au) (210.9.240.37) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2002 02:54:37 -0000 Received: from kennel (dial-ctb0327.webone.com.au [210.9.243.27]) by cts04.webone.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9L2sNC17239; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:54:23 +1000 Received: by kennel (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA377E046; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:02:26 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 19:54:00 -0000 From: Andreas Bauer To: Jan Hubicka Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rth@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [3.4-BIB] x86-64 sibcall fixes Message-ID: <20021021030226.GI25337@kennel> References: <20021015175807.GY30297@kam.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021015175807.GY30297@kam.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01219.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 07:58:07PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > this patch fix two problems I found while looking into the sibcall > code on x86-64. Otherwise it seems to do the sibcalls > What else is missing? Note, on 3.4 BIB, the macro FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL is no longer in effect. We now have #define TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL ARCH_function_ok_for_sibcall Where ARCH is the target platform. Cheers, Andi.