From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18863 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2002 07:47:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18817 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2002 07:47:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU) (128.250.1.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 2002 07:47:51 -0000 Received: from ceres.cs.mu.oz.au (mail@ceres.cs.mu.OZ.AU [128.250.25.4]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with ESMTP id SAA17125; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:47:42 +1100 (EST) Received: from fjh by ceres.cs.mu.oz.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1864cf-0005io-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:47:41 +1100 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:47:00 -0000 From: Fergus Henderson To: "Martin v. L?wis" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Implementing Universal Character Names in identifiers Message-ID: <20021028074741.GA21921@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au> References: <200210280715.g9S7FdI2003815@paros.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210280715.g9S7FdI2003815@paros.informatik.hu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01671.txt.bz2 On 28-Oct-2002, Martin v. L?wis wrote: > Index: cpplex.c ... > + Note that extended character support in identifiers has not yet been > + implemented. It is my personal opinion that this is not a desirable > + feature. Portable code cannot count on support for more than the basic > + identifier character set. */ Your patch makes that comment out-of-date, doesn't it? -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit" WWW: | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.