From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15502 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2002 21:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15431 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2002 21:14:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.104) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 2002 21:14:07 -0000 Received: from northrelay05.pok.ibm.com (northrelay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.23]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9SLDwaZ242158; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:13:58 -0500 Received: from dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com (dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.17.68]) by northrelay05.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id g9SLDrC7071016; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:13:53 -0500 Received: (from janis@localhost) by dyn9-47-17-68.beaverton.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA02102; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:15:54 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:14:00 -0000 From: Janis Johnson To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Janis Johnson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove mention of -a and -ax in invoke.texi for 3.2 Message-ID: <20021028131554.A2083@us.ibm.com> References: <20021028113144.A1772@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:01:57PM +0100 X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01721.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:01:57PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Janis Johnson wrote: > > The message http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg01615.html reported > > that the 3.2 documentation references the -a and -ax options. The > > documentation for those options was removed, but they were still > > mentioned in the entry for -profile-arcs. > > Given this... > > > OK for the 3.2 branch? This text is already gone in the mainline. > > > > 2002-10-28 Janis Johnson > > > > * doc/invoke.texi (-profile-arcs): Remove references to -a and -ax. > > ...the patch seems to fall under the "obvious rule"? > > -This option makes it possible to estimate branch probabilities and to > -calculate basic block execution counts. > > Should this part really be removed as well? It was gone from the mainline so I removed it from the branch. The information is implied in the first part of this section, and it would look out of place to leave this sentence at the end. Janis