From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19595 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 23:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 23:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 23:07:16 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6N5hP27020; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:05:43 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6N7Fl29936; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:07:16 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6N7FD07548; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:07:15 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6N7Fj22489; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:07:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 15:07:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Zack Weinberg Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: patch/RFC: PR optimization/8423 Message-ID: <20021106230715.GN22215@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Zack Weinberg , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20021105215500.GF1050@egil.codesourcery.com> <20021106192337.GI22066@redhat.com> <20021106193644.GA11317@egil.codesourcery.com> <20021106223345.GI22215@redhat.com> <20021106230116.GA16220@egil.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021106230116.GA16220@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:01:16PM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote: > How hard would it be to teach gcse about aliasing > memory and registers? Very. r~