From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27469 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 01:06:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27415 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 01:06:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 01:06:32 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA814uP27079; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:04:56 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA816Ul08817; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:06:30 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA816UD16135; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:06:30 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA816Tq29429; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:06:29 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 17:06:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Geoff Keating , "zack@codesourcery.com" , "jakub@redhat.com" , "aldyh@redhat.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "jason@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [basic-improvements] try/finally support for c/c++ - more tests Message-ID: <20021108010629.GH26257@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , Geoff Keating , "zack@codesourcery.com" , "jakub@redhat.com" , "aldyh@redhat.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "jason@redhat.com" References: <20021107234453.GE26257@redhat.com> <133260000.1036714743@warlock.codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <133260000.1036714743@warlock.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:19:03PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote: > It has somewhat fancy semantics... Well, the __finally part of Microsoft's extensions are fairly normal. It's the __except part of their extensions that are fancy. That's the one I *don't* want to implement. ;-) > I would prefer longjmp_unwind; that's something we're supposed to > have anyhow, and it would be very useful in making existing C > libraries play more nicely with C++, so implementing that would be > a definite win. I'll play with this week after next and see how it goes. If it can be made to interoperate correctly across c/c++, as well as not absolutely requiring C to be compiled with -fexceptions, then we'll go ahead with that. r~