From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15711 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2002 23:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15700 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2002 23:18:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2002 23:18:43 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with ESMTP id gA9NIgSf003516; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 18:18:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) id gA9NIfIk003515; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 18:18:41 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200211092318.gA9NIfIk003515@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: ABI bug for vcall offsets To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (John David Anglin) Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:18:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com In-Reply-To: from "John David Anglin" at Nov 9, 2002 06:15:54 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 > I noticed today a new fail on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, vthunk3.C. It fails > scan-assembler _ZTvn4_n20_N1E1bEv. This doesn't seem like the correct > symbol name to test for on a 64-bit target. I see _ZTvn8_n40_N1E1bEv or This might also be the reason why FAIL: g++.dg/abi/vague1.C scan-assembler-not _ZN1AIiE1tE fails. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)