From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25520 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 22:31:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25512 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 22:31:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO atlrel8.hp.com) (156.153.255.206) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 22:31:54 -0000 Received: from hpda.cup.hp.com (hpda.cup.hp.com [15.75.208.53]) by atlrel8.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E97A007D0; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:31:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from hpsje.cup.hp.com (hpsje.cup.hp.com [15.244.96.221]) by hpda.cup.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC154540; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sje@localhost) by hpsje.cup.hp.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.7.3 TIS Messaging 5.0) id OAA00476; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:31:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 14:31:00 -0000 From: Steve Ellcey Message-Id: <200212042231.OAA00476@hpsje.cup.hp.com> To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: HP-UX PA long double alignment change In-Reply-To: <200212042222.gB4MM5Nv000384@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 > > >From my reading of the documentation, I think you need both. > > I wonder if GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT could be redefined? > > I have tested the following on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. > There are no regressions and it reduces the alignment of long doubles in a > simple manner. However, it does require modifying machmode.h to allow > defining GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT in the target headers. > > Is this ok for main? > > Sorry Steve, I didn't mean to usurp your work. > > Dave That's quite alright with me. This looks simpler then changing both ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN and DATA_ALIGNMENT (and possibly LOCAL_ALIGNMENT) to get them all to match up. Steve