From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15996 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 17:15:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15985 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 17:15:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mururoa.inria.fr) (138.96.80.8) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 17:15:44 -0000 Received: from mururoa.inria.fr (papadop@localhost) by mururoa.inria.fr (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gBJHFVP6015329; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:15:31 +0100 Message-Id: <200212191715.gBJHFVP6015329@mururoa.inria.fr> To: Gabriel Dos Reis cc: Phil Edwards , Jason Merrill , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: V3 PATCH to __verbose_terminate_handler In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:15:00 -0000 From: Theodore Papadopoulo X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2 gdr@integrable-solutions.net said: > In that case I would rather see a switch distinct from -ansi. -ansi > is too bloated, IMHO. Agreed... > Hmmm, do you mean that a dry "zsh: ./a.out: abort" is clearer and more > useful that a message saying that the program was terminated because > of an uncaught exception? I meant exactly the opposite. A message saying "Uncaught exception" would be much better than this "abort". Theo. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Theodore Papadopoulo Email: Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr Tel: (33) 04 92 38 76 01 --------------------------------------------------------------------