From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10531 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2002 21:15:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10497 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2002 21:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2002 21:14:59 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJLAjN25147; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:10:45 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJLEhN22563; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:14:43 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBJLEgg13038; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:14:42 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBJLEgK10494; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:14:42 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:15:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: Patch: fix SPEC regressions Message-ID: <20021219211442.GA10484@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Eric Botcazou , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Dale Johannesen References: <1C457790-EAAD-11D6-B8DA-000393D76DAA@apple.com> <200211211909.59272.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200212142339.21146.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <200212171428.25955.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212171428.25955.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01046.txt.bz2 On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:30:16PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > And to commit this one instead, which gives the correct computation in all > cases on K6 with -O2 -funroll-loops. It passed bootstrapping/regtesting on > i586-redhat-linux-gnu and I've asked Franz Sirl to test it on powerpc too. Why doesn't this test case fail on mainline? r~