Re: gcc.dg/i386-local2.c breaks testsuite on x86

[Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>]

> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> It looks like your recent testcase, gcc.dg/i386-local2.c breaks
> the gcc testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  For example, see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-03/msg00405.html
> 
> Specifically this bit of that posting:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-local.c (test for excess errors)
> ERROR: gcc.dg/i386-local.c: error executing dg-final: couldn't open
> "i386-local.s": no such file or directory
> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/i386-local.c: error executing dg-final: couldn't open
> "i386-local.s": no such file or directory
> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "re" does not exist.
> 
> The syntax of the DejaGNU directive at the start of the file, i.e.
> 
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "sub.*[re]sp" } } */
> 
> is being misinterpreted, so that the "re" in the regular expression
> is considered a Tcl procedure.  This terminates the gcc testsuite
> prematurely, effectively creating ~400 regressions on the gcc tests.
> You'll notice there's only ~17,000 passes for gcc in the above e-mail
> rather then the expected ~21,000.

Strange, there is no such problem in my runs.  I will fix it by
replacing re by .

Honza
> 
> This might be caused by different versions of DejaGNU, if your
> testing can't reproduce it.  I'm currently running Tcl 8.3, expect
> 5.33.0 and dejagnu 1.4.0.  I tried upgrading to dejagnu 1.4.3 but
> that doesn't build/install cleanly on RedHat 7.2.
> 
> 
> Given the otehr bootstrap failures caused by this commit, might it
> be that you applied an earlier version of your patch?  You'll notice
> that there are also non-fatal errors from your gcc.dg/i386-local.c
> change.
> 
> Many thanks in advance,
> 
> Roger
> --
> Roger Sayle,                         E-mail: roger@eyesopen.com
> OpenEye Scientific Software,         WWW: http://www.eyesopen.com/
> Suite 1107, 3600 Cerrillos Road,     Tel: (+1) 505-473-7385
> Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87507.         Fax: (+1) 505-473-0833