From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13410 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2003 18:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13402 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2003 18:37:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca) (132.246.100.193) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2003 18:37:13 -0000 Received: from hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h64IbCgL019757; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:37:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from dave@localhost) by hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h64IbC2m019756; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 14:37:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200307041837.h64IbC2m019756@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Subject: Re: [Boehm-GC] Limit +ESdbgasm to HPUX cc on PA To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 18:37:00 -0000 From: "John David Anglin" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, roger@eyesopen.com, hans_boehm@hp.com In-Reply-To: <87znjumapc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> from "Tom Tromey" at Jul 4, 2003 12:02:55 pm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2 > Quite possible. Did he implement the closure API? That is needed for Yes, it looks like he implemented the closure API. At my last test, the were some issues with small structs. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)