From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30145 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2003 10:16:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30135 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 10:16:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.123) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 10:16:17 -0000 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 29025) id 2DBCF4C028F; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:16:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:11:00 -0000 From: Zdenek Dvorak To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Message-ID: <20031019101617.GA15107@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01610.txt.bz2 Hello, could someone please review http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02991.html? I would like to get this in, since it uses value profiling, and I feel wrong about having a piece of unused and therefore untested code in gcc. And of course, it also makes a nice improvement in benchmarks. Zdenek