From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30343 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30332 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.125) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Received: by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 29129) id 9B2003F44; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:56:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:56:00 -0000 From: Josef Zlomek To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Jan Hubicka , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Share clobbers of hard registers... Message-ID: <20040205105613.GA806@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20040119204859.GX7878@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205101811.GA2838@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205103804.GF10714@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205105319.GB32482@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040205105319.GB32482@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-02.o/txt/msg00399.txt > > Hmm, what it makes difference on whether it is REG/v or REG? > > Clobber is shared thus it is different to REG_UNUSED note, > thus find_reg_note on reg-stack.c:1413 and 1428 does not find a note. Maybe better fix would be write something like find_reg_notes but more intelligent... Josef From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30343 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30332 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.31.125) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2004 10:56:14 -0000 Received: by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 29129) id 9B2003F44; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:56:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:45:00 -0000 From: Josef Zlomek To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Jan Hubicka , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Share clobbers of hard registers... Message-ID: <20040205105613.GA806@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20040119204859.GX7878@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205101811.GA2838@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205103804.GF10714@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040205105319.GB32482@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040205105319.GB32482@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00399.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040221134500.SJFigGmyEZ2BlSAFwxRvYAQkyj6c2LUukoOGarKSSzc@z> > > Hmm, what it makes difference on whether it is REG/v or REG? > > Clobber is shared thus it is different to REG_UNUSED note, > thus find_reg_note on reg-stack.c:1413 and 1428 does not find a note. Maybe better fix would be write something like find_reg_notes but more intelligent... Josef