From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-109900-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28220 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 15:19:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28200 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 15:19:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 15:19:57 -0000
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin [192.168.1.7] verified)
  by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 5963297; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:19:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200402091342.i19Dgij05412@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
References: <200402091342.i19Dgij05412@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-ID: <689DAFA5-5B13-11D8-ABD3-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: zlomj9am@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Josef Zlomek),
 roger@eyesopen.com (Roger Sayle),
 gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Subject: Re: debug info breaks build (Was: Re: Variable tracking (location lists support) - part 2)
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:45:00 -0000
To: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00812.txt.bz2
Message-ID: <20040221134500.kQjFh7W7ys3qg--3KS0jII_JYdA4hMTL2kZpVbFfYok@z>


On Feb 9, 2004, at 8:42 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote:

> The addition of location list support broke sh-elf and sh64-elf builds.
> Presumably all targets with a non-empty USTER_LABEL_PREFIX and dwarf2
> debugging information are affected.
>
>
> The current form of this code is:
>
>   if (strcmp (curr->section, ".text") == 0)
>     {
>       /* dw2_asm_output_data will mask off any extra bits in the ~0.  
> */
>       dw2_asm_output_data (DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE, ~(unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 
> 0,
>                            "Location list base address specifier fake 
> entry");
>       dw2_asm_output_offset (DWARF2_ADDR_SIZE, curr->section,
>                              "Location list base address specifier 
> base");
>     }
>



There should be no need for this hunk of code anymore.

Does deleting it help?