From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1769 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2004 15:17:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1737 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2004 15:17:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2004 15:17:01 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZtCm-0006sa-0y; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:17:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Paul Brook , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Patch ping Message-ID: <20040614151659.GA26392@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , Paul Brook , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <200406141210.23634.paul@codesourcery.com> <40CDBA87.9010403@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40CDBA87.9010403@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01025.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:47:35AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Paul Brook wrote: > > >The following patch seems to have slipped past without comment. > > > >Create DWARF3 cie frame entries: > >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00845.html > > > >The infrastructure to support this change (ie. unwinder and debugger) > >should now be in place. > > OK. Must we? This will silently regress debugging support for anyone using the most recent released version of GDB or the upcoming GDB 6.1.1. I don't see any point in generating DWARF3 CIEs unless we actually have a need for the uleb128. -- Daniel Jacobowitz