From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25597 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2004 22:56:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25590 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2004 22:56:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2004 22:56:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5EMrOp4029146; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:53:24 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5EMu2w19983; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:56:02 -0400 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5EMu2P18352; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:56:02 -0700 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5EMu1Qw029644; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:56:01 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5EMu1WX029642; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:56:01 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:08:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Paul Brook Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Patch ping Message-ID: <20040614225601.GA29620@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Paul Brook , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <200406141210.23634.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406141210.23634.paul@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01064.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 12:10:23PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > Create DWARF3 cie frame entries: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00845.html Hum. Given that this is the only difference between the two formats, I don't see the point of this particular test. Instead, test DWARF_FRAME_RETURN_COLUMN >= 256 and set the CIE version to 3 in that case, and output the uleb128. r~