From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: mark@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell)
Cc: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406220501.i5M51EH12548@tin.geop.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D7B687.7060903@codesourcery.com> from "Mark Mitchell" at Jun 21, 2004 09:33:11 PM
> I don't agree.
>
> In particular, you've just added an extra entry to ARRAY_REF and
> COMPONENT_REF, making these two common tree nodes bigger.
> (COMPONENT_REF, in particular, is used extensively in C++; every access
> to a class member variable is a COMPONENT_REF.) These extra entries are
> unnecessary in C and C++, meaning that for GCC's two most-used languages
> you've just increased memory usage with no benefit. If you need some
> additional stuff for Ada, please find a way that doesn't penalize C and C++.
In fact I had a patch for tree-unnested to get rid of the impliciant uses
for OFFSET, see <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg00373.html>
Which fixed the problem a different way.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-22 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-22 7:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 7:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 9:14 ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2004-06-22 14:16 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-22 11:00 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 13:52 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-07-29 17:02 ` Diego Novillo
2004-06-22 16:33 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 17:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 18:17 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 18:52 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 19:37 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-06-22 16:34 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 17:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 17:21 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-22 19:01 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 18:19 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 18:36 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 18:37 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 18:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 18:33 Richard Kenner
[not found] <10406221359.AA05860@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
2004-06-22 18:47 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 19:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:10 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 20:27 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-22 20:22 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 20:23 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:37 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-23 20:47 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-06-24 14:59 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-24 16:26 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-06-24 19:57 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-06-24 20:06 ` Diego Novillo
2004-06-24 20:24 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-06-24 22:35 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-06-24 21:33 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-06-24 21:01 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-25 14:51 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-06-22 20:40 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 22:02 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 22:27 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 20:44 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-23 20:58 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-06-22 20:54 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:06 ` Paul Brook
2004-06-22 21:37 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 21:01 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:07 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:12 ` Bryce McKinlay
2004-06-22 21:10 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 22:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-06-22 21:27 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 21:30 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 22:04 ` Paul Brook
2004-06-22 22:18 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23 1:07 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 23:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23 11:42 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-23 0:16 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23 2:32 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23 4:54 ` Bryce McKinlay
2004-06-23 5:54 Richard Kenner
2004-06-24 15:58 Richard Kenner
2004-06-24 16:04 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-25 14:43 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-25 15:28 Richard Kenner
2004-06-28 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-07-29 17:12 Richard Kenner
2004-07-29 17:13 ` Diego Novillo
2004-07-29 17:57 ` Richard Henderson
2004-07-29 18:43 Richard Kenner
2004-07-29 19:02 Richard Kenner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406220501.i5M51EH12548@tin.geop.uc.edu \
--to=pinskia@physics.uc.edu \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).