From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23850 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2004 17:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23842 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 17:45:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 17:45:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MHgnp4010015; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:42:49 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5MHjjw20580; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:45:45 -0400 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5MHjjP04137; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:45:45 -0700 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MHjiQw005680; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:45:44 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5MHjiru005678; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:45:44 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Message-ID: <20040622174544.GA5622@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Mark Mitchell , Richard Kenner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <10406221307.AA05385@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <40D857AB.1020800@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D857AB.1020800@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01767.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:00:43AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > That's fine with me if you will agree to implement the optimization > where these nodes are smaller when the extra fields are not needed, or > implement new tree nodes for VARIABLE_ARRAY_REF or > VARIABLE_COMPONENT_REF. I believe I suggested new tree nodes at the beginning of the discussion, but Kenner didn't want to go there. I still think it's the best solution. r~