From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-120436-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29175 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2004 19:03:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29142 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2004 19:03:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO physunc.phy.uc.edu) (129.137.4.6)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 2004 19:03:45 -0000
Received: from tin.geop.uc.edu (tin.geop.uc.edu [10.44.11.213])
	by physunc.phy.uc.edu (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06586;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pinskia@localhost)
	by tin.geop.uc.edu (8.11.6/8.9.3) id i5OJ3hv24750;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:03:43 -0400
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Message-Id: <200406241903.i5OJ3hv24750@tin.geop.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
To: dnovillo@redhat.com (Diego Novillo)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:24:00 -0000
Cc: laurent@guerby.net (Laurent GUERBY),
        rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org (Richard Earnshaw),
        jsm@polyomino.org.uk (Joseph S. Myers),
        geoffk@geoffk.org (Geoff Keating),
        kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner),
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org)
In-Reply-To: <1088103413.4741.96.camel@localhost.localdomain> from "Diego Novillo" at Jun 24, 2004 02:56:53 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg01979.txt.bz2

> 
> On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 14:46, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> 
> > It would be more interesting to have a fixed piece of code compile time,
> > like a stable release with some tools, daily CVS bootstrap time is a
> > poor indicator of compile time speed, it can vary greatly for
> > reasons unrelated to pure compile speed.
> > 
> We do: SPEC.
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/global-build-secs_elapsed.html
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec95/gcc/global-build-secs_elapsed.html

Or even better look at the individual build time for the SPEC benchmarks:
<http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/individual-build-secs_elapsed.html>

You will see that VPR and GCC compile time increased after the patch went in.

Another good site is the one for POOMA, C++ code:
<http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/monitor-summary.html>

You will see that compile time went up there too with no increase in preformance at all.

Andrew