From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30125 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2004 10:25:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30113 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2004 10:25:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.31.10) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 28 Jun 2004 10:25:51 -0000 Received: from faui1m.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui1m [131.188.31.43]) by faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.9-FAU) with ESMTP id MAA24207; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:25:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Weigand Received: (from weigand@localhost) by faui1m.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.6-FAU) id MAA10740; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:25:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200406281025.MAA10740@faui1m.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Subject: Re: Unreviewed patch To: roger@eyesopen.com (Roger Sayle) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:19:00 -0000 Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Weigand), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: from "Roger Sayle" at Jun 27, 2004 10:22:40 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg02350.txt.bz2 Roger Sayle wrote: > This patch looks fine technically and conceptually, but I'd feel much > happier if it had been tested on more than just the s390 backend. > Ok for mainline provided that bootstrapping and regression testing > pass on at least one other architecture, perhaps x86 or powerpc? I've now bootstrapped and tested (with no new regressions) the patch on i686-pc-linux and ia64-unknown-linux. OK to commit now? Bye, Ulric -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de