From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3102 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 08:50:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3055 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 08:50:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 08:50:39 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i678l6St016960 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 04:47:07 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i678oaw27044; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 04:50:36 -0400 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i678oZP18229; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:50:35 -0700 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i678oZQw005476; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:50:35 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i678oZwm005474; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:50:35 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:06:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@redhat.com Subject: Re: add h8sx support to h8300 Message-ID: <20040707085035.GA5417@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Alexandre Oliva , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@redhat.com References: <20040707013159.GA31661@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:55:43AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Can do. Patch is attached. Will test i686-pc-linux-gnu native > overnight. Ok to install if it passes? Ok. > However, even if it's close to stpcpy(), some arches will have the > final register point one-past the NUL terminator, whereas others might > have it point to the NUL terminator itself. I suppose we should > probably model movstr exactly after stpcpy(), even if that takes an > additional increment/decrement instruction to get the right value. Probably. With one output. r~