From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5866 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 12:18:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5853 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 12:18:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 12:18:50 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i67CIoe1012492; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:50 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i67CIo004905; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:50 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i67CIL4m002449; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:21 -0400 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i67CILmE002446; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:46:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jan Beulich Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: widen conditions to use vec_extract patterns Message-ID: <20040707121820.GG21264@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:12:53PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. > > 2004-07-07 Jan Beulich > > * expmed.c (extract_bit_field): Correct condition to use > vec_extract > patterns also on vector elements other than the first one. > * config/i386/i386.md (vec_extractv2df, vec_extractv4sf): Add > missing > break statements. The wrapped up patches aren't IMHO very readable and having every patch in each mail twice is not very useful either. Please either fix your mailer so that it doesn't wrap lines (then you can post the patches inline and not as attachments), or send them as attachments only. Jakub