From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-130937-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8379 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2004 03:47:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8371 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2004 03:47:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Oct 2004 03:47:45 -0000
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [129.34.20.41])
	by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i9F3kk7256176
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:46:46 -0400
Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7/01-14-2004_2) with ESMTP id i9F3lh861090
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:47:43 -0400
Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (makai.watson.ibm.com [9.2.216.144])
	by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7/01-14-2004_1) with ESMTP id i9F3lhh61088
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:47:43 -0400
Received: from watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0/03-06-2002) with ESMTP id i9F3lfV10588;
	Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:47:41 -0400
Message-Id: <200410150347.i9F3lfV10588@makai.watson.ibm.com>
To: Revital Eres <ERES@il.ibm.com>
cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Splitting memory references during unrolling (resubmission)
References: <OFF5944C51.2C5E0161-ONC2256F2D.0039E7AE-C2256F2D.0046FD77@il.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 03:48:00 -0000
From: David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01251.txt.bz2

	What is the current SPEC performance benefit from this patch?

Thanks, David