From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3127 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2004 02:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3114 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2004 02:37:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.10) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2004 02:37:32 -0000 Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i9H2b6BS012335; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:37:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ghazi@localhost) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i9H2b6B3012334; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:37:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:05:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Message-Id: <200410170237.i9H2b6B3012334@caip.rutgers.edu> To: hp@bitrange.com Subject: Re: Committed: Fix C99:ism (declaration after statement) in java FE. Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01360.txt.bz2 > Hope to look into adding -Wdeclaration-after-statement for all > front-ends @WERROR@ settings (stage2 or where supported). No need for a new flag, just add -pedantic like the other FEs do. (Haven't tried it myself, probably requires cleaning other fallout.) --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu