From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20434 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 23:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20423 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 23:54:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e1.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.101) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 23:54:54 -0000 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/NS PXFA) with ESMTP id i9INssrZ103510; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:54:54 -0400 Received: from dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i9INsr4A267938; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:54:53 -0400 Received: from dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9INsnnG021998; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:54:49 -0700 Received: (from janis@localhost) by dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i9INsiS9021827; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:54:44 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com: janis set sender to janis187@us.ibm.com using -f Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:55:00 -0000 From: Janis Johnson To: Janis Johnson Cc: Aldy Hernandez , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dorit@il.ibm.com Subject: Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/ Message-ID: <20041018235444.GA5842@us.ibm.com> References: <20041018194119.GA10231@redhat.com> <20041018220609.GA26745@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041018220609.GA26745@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01577.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:06:09PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > I have also disabled the powerpc tests when VMX is not available. Right > > now, we indiscriminately try to run tests when hardware may not be > > available. > > > > I am not sure if we may still want to run the tests, especially the compile > > tests even if the HW is not available. Dorit? Folks? If this is the > > case, then we can just disable the tests for powerpc-*-*spe. > > Compiling and the checks in the dg-final step are useful, so perhaps we > can change the "dg-do" option from "run" to "compile" if the hardware > doesn't have vector support, as is done for the gcc.dg/vmx tests. I'll > take a look and let you know if it will fit in nicely with the vect test > infrastructure. I'm making progress but have questions for Dorit and others who have contributed the vect tests: Tests vect-72.c and vect-73.c use -mpowerpc64. That has no effect on a biarch compiler; should it have been -m64? I always test a biarch compiler with both -m32 and -m64 anyway so using -m64 in a test would cause problems, or at least confusion. There are tests in other parts of the testsuite that are only relevant for either -m32 or -m64 that we're trying to figure out how to handle. There are currently 91 tests in gcc.dg/vect and only 31 of them specify mipsisa64*-*-* as a target. Is it an oversight that most of the other tests are not run for mipsisa64? Janis