From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-131427-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6464 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2004 17:25:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6457 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 17:25:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.131)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 17:25:02 -0000
Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11])
	by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i9KHOsL4690946
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:24:54 -0400
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168])
	by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i9KHOsNT345528
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:24:54 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9KHOrUx019349
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:24:53 -0600
Received: from dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (DYN318378BLD.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.18.189])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9KHOrZX019337;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:24:53 -0600
Received: from dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9KHOpLN001788;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:24:51 -0700
Received: (from janis@localhost)
	by dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i9KHOniN001786;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:24:49 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: dyn318378bld.beaverton.ibm.com: janis set sender to janis187@us.ibm.com using -f
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:25:00 -0000
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: patch: cleanup gcc.dg/vect/
Message-ID: <20041020172448.GA1765@us.ibm.com>
References: <20041018235444.GA5842@us.ibm.com> <OF7F2B698B.CADDDCCF-ONC2256F32.0042754E-C2256F32.00441055@il.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF7F2B698B.CADDDCCF-ONC2256F32.0042754E-C2256F32.00441055@il.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01741.txt.bz2

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Dorit Naishlos wrote:
> 
> As for the -mpowerpc64 issue:
> 
> > Tests vect-72.c and vect-73.c use -mpowerpc64.  That has no effect on a
> > biarch compiler; should it have been -m64?
> 
> no. (by the way, it's actually tests vect-82_64.c and vect-83_64.c,
> right?).

Yes, I got the names wrong.  Should those tests only be run for
powerpc64-*-*, rather than powerpc*-*-*?

Test pr16105.c is not run for x86_64; is that an oversight?

Janis