From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30270 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2007 01:01:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 30253 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2007 01:01:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bromo.msbb.uc.edu (HELO bromo.msbb.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:01:02 +0000 Received: by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2E46F11003D; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:00:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:01:00 -0000 From: Jack Howarth To: Paul Richard Thomas Cc: roger@eyesopen.com, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [FORTRAN PATCH] Improved scalarization of constant array constructors Message-ID: <20070109010058.GA4617@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> References: <339c37f20701080123lc8c5d8ap37e3a4a5252b6d3e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <339c37f20701080123lc8c5d8ap37e3a4a5252b6d3e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 Paul, Is this patch well defined enough that it might be safe for gcc 4.2 branch as well? If it provides a significant performance improvement that might merit the risk. Jack On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:23:50AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Roger, > > Thank you, as usual, for a nicely prepared and explained patch. > > >Ok for mainline? > > I regtested it on Cygwin_NT/PIV - OK > > Paul