From: Bernhard Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com>
Cc: Brooks Moses <brooks.moses@codesourcery.com>,
fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite, committed] Clean up gfortran.dg leftover module files.
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070327165423.GA11354@aon.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8FCB7046-4436-4B07-B925-E120A52AF907@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2878 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:28:40PM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
>>There are still a lot of module files left over from running
>>gfortran.fortran-torture, since (as Kaveh pointed out) that doesn't
>>recognize dg-final directives. I've got a patch that adds the
>>directives, but not one for recognizing them yet....
>
>I'm wondering why we don't simply incorporate all these tests in the
>gfortran.dg framework. It's rather easy to do, we just need to add
>the compile tests a { dg-do compile } line, and the execution tests
>both { dg-do run } and { dg-options "-w" }. There are a few special
>cases (the execution tests associated to a .x file), but nothing too
>difficult. We could even move them into subdirectory so we don't mix
>everything.
Short of teaching dejagnu to automagically rm all .mod by scanning the
input for 'module [procedure] name', perhaps a quick script like the
attached would ease the handling of those?
Something for contrib/, perhaps?
Just a thought..
Sample output:
gfortran.dg$ ~/gfortran.dg-final.cleanup-mods.awk *f *f90 *inc
Wrong encoding! sed -i -e 's/\x0D//g' actual_array_constructor_2.f90
[snip a handful of those]
Wrong encoding! sed -i -e 's/\x0D//g' used_types_4.f90
alloc_comp_basics_1.f90: no cleanup for module 'alloc_m'
assumed_charlen_function_1.f90: no cleanup for module 'integer_sets'
equiv_constraint_7.f90: no cleanup for module 'data'
error_recovery_1.f90: no cleanup for module 'gfcbug29_import'
func_derived_4.f90: no cleanup for module 'class_field'
interface_3.f90: no cleanup for module 'test_mod2'
keyword_symbol_1.f90: no cleanup for module 'blahblah'
sequence_types_1.f90: no cleanup for module 'data_types'
simpleif_2.f90: no cleanup for module 'read'
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ \1/' actual_array_constructor_1.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ alloc_m\1/' alloc_comp_basics_1.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ integer_sets\1/' assumed_charlen_function_1.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ data\1/' equiv_constraint_7.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ gfcbug29_import\1/' error_recovery_1.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ class_field\1/' func_derived_4.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ test_mod2\1/' interface_3.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ blahblah\1/' keyword_symbol_1.f90
sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\("[[:space:]]*}\)/ data_types\1/' sequence_types_1.f90
The "Wrong encoding" and "no cleanup for module" go to stderr, so to
automatically append the missing modules to cleanup-modules, do >
/dev/null and eval the rest
Untested, so beware..
>
>Speaking of which: there's a gfortran.dg/g77 directory, but it looks
>like the tests in it are never actually run when I do "make check-
>gfortran". Is that expected?
>
>FX
>
[-- Attachment #2: gfortran.dg-final.cleanup-mods.awk --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1469 bytes --]
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
# Public Domain
/[eE][nN][dD][ \t]*[mM][oO][dD][uU][lL][eE]/ { next; }
/^[ \t]*[mM][oO][dD][uU][lL][eE][ \t]/ {
if (tolower($2) == "procedure")
next;
pos++;
tmp = tolower($2);
gsub(/[ \t
]*/, "", tmp);
mod[pos] = tmp;
file[pos] = FILENAME;
# printf("%s:%d saw module '%s'\n", FILENAME, FNR, $2);
}
/{[ \t]*cleanup-modules/ {
cleanup = tolower($0);
sub(/.*{[ \t]*cleanup-modules/, "", cleanup);
gsub(/[ \t][ \t]*/, " ", cleanup);
gsub(/(^[ \t]+|["{}])/, "", cleanup);
gsub(/[ \t]*$/, "", cleanup);
split(cleanup, mods);
for (i in mods) {
cleaned++;
clean[cleaned] = mods[i];
}
}
/
/ {
if (warned_encoding[FILENAME] != 1) {
warned_encoding[FILENAME] = 1;
print "Wrong encoding\x21 sed -i -e 's/\\x0D//g' "FILENAME > "/dev/stderr"
}
}
BEGIN {
pos = -1;
cleaned = -1;
fixup = 1;
}
END {
done = 0;
for (i = 0; i <= pos; i++) {
for (j in clean) {
if (mod[i] == clean[j]) {
delete mod[i];
}
}
}
for (i = 0; i <= pos; i++) {
if (length(mod[i])) {
printf("%s: no cleanup for module '%s'\n",
file[i], mod[i]) > "/dev/stderr";
if (fixup) {
emit[file[i]] = emit[file[i]] " " mod[i];
gsub(/^[ ]*/, "", emit[file[i]]);
}
}
}
if (fixup) {
oldfile = file[0];
for (i = 0; i <= pos; i++) {
if (length(emit[file[i]]) && (oldfile != file[i])) {
printf("sed -i -e '/cleanup-modules/s/\\(\"[[:space:]]*}\\)/ %s\\1/' %s\n", emit[oldfile], oldfile);
oldfile = file[i];
}
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-26 21:40 Brooks Moses
2007-03-26 21:45 ` FX Coudert
2007-03-27 17:24 ` Bernhard Fischer [this message]
2007-03-27 17:29 ` Bernhard Fischer
2012-03-01 21:10 ` [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-03-09 0:04 ` Mikael Morin
2012-03-13 16:39 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-03-13 20:31 ` Mike Stump
2012-03-15 12:40 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-03-15 15:57 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-15 16:56 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-03-15 19:36 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-03-16 10:05 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-03-16 15:00 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-06-29 0:15 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-06-29 0:55 ` Mike Stump
2012-06-29 0:56 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-06-29 5:43 ` Mike Stump
2013-06-07 14:30 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2013-06-10 23:21 ` Ben Elliston
2012-03-19 17:36 ` Rainer Orth
2012-03-22 12:30 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-04-03 12:17 ` [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules, part 2 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-04-03 12:58 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-04-13 10:51 ` PING " Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-04-13 13:58 ` Mike Stump
2012-04-13 14:40 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-04-13 20:09 ` Mike Stump
2012-04-13 14:15 ` Mike Stump
2015-04-23 8:55 ` [PATCH] gfortran testsuite: implicitly cleanup-modules Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-04-29 21:58 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070327165423.GA11354@aon.at \
--to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=brooks.moses@codesourcery.com \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).