From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25928 invoked by alias); 18 May 2007 11:16:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 25865 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2007 11:16:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2007 11:15:52 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9355C4B267; Fri, 18 May 2007 06:15:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619F74B262; Fri, 18 May 2007 06:15:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hp0Qv-0008Gk-CT; Fri, 18 May 2007 07:15:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dave Korn Cc: libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm, 'Steve Ellcey' , bonzini@gnu.org, newlib@sourceware.org, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and Src trees Message-ID: <20070518111541.GA31772@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Korn , libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm, 'Steve Ellcey' , bonzini@gnu.org, newlib@sourceware.org, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org References: <200705172103.OAA10817@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <1179445488.20378.1190437705@webmail.messagingengine.com> <093a01c79933$f37cc250$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <093a01c79933$f37cc250$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg01200.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:04:41AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > > Module definitions are not versioned. > > AYS? What was that link up there? He's right of course. The file is saved in version control, but HEAD is used for all branches. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery