From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28019 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2007 01:40:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 28010 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2007 01:40:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:40:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6P1eZn5003995; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:35 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [10.11.254.111]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6P1eZMk007120; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:35 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (vpn-14-8.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.8]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6P1eWIN001896; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:35 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6P1eWUM002762; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:32 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l6P1eVjQ002759; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:40:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200707250140.l6P1eVjQ002759@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: bje@au1.ibm.com CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, ian@airs.com, dberlin@dberlin.org In-reply-to: <1185324590.19345.28.camel@localhost> (message from Ben Elliston on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:49:50 +1000) Subject: Re: PATCH: remove libiberty/ternary.c et al References: <1185324590.19345.28.camel@localhost> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg01796.txt.bz2 It's been sitting there for six years, and I'm not a fan of making new libiberty versions not backward compatible. Are there any other reasons to remove it besides "it's there" ?