public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@sygehus.dk>
To: Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lower-subreg: Decompose multiword shifts
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070802231609.GL25795@sygehus.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070802153434.GA24953@blc4eb430604175.ibm.com>

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:34:34PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> the attached patch enhances the lower subreg pass to be able to
> decompose multiword shift instructions.
> 
> Currently GCC generates quite ugly code (on s390 31bit) for a function
> like the first of the attached testcase:
> 
> u64
> foo (u32 high, u32 low)
> {
>   return ((u64)high << 32) | low;
> }

   On x86_64 with -O2 -march=k6 -m32, I get:

foo:
	pushl	%ebp		# 39	*pushsi2	[length = 1]
	movl	%esp, %ebp	# 40	*movsi_1/1	[length = 2]
	movl	8(%ebp), %edx	# 37	*movsi_1/1	[length = 3]
	movl	12(%ebp), %eax	# 10	*movsi_1/1	[length = 3]
	leave			# 43	leave	[length = 1]
	movl	%edx, %ecx	# 46	*movsi_1/1	[length = 2]
	movl	%ecx, %edx	# 11	*movsi_1/1	[length = 2]
	ret			# 44	return_internal	[length = 1]

   This appears sort of fine, i.e. no shifts, with just two useless "movl"
instructions. But the shift remains until the split4 pass, leaving the two
"movl" instructions behind. So I tried your patch:

foo:
	pushl	%ebp		# 43	*pushsi2	[length = 1]
	movl	%esp, %ebp	# 44	*movsi_1/1	[length = 2]
	pushl	%esi		# 45	*pushsi2	[length = 1]
	pushl	%ebx		# 46	*pushsi2	[length = 1]
	movl	12(%ebp), %eax	# 39	*movsi_1/1	[length = 3]
	popl	%ebx		# 49	popsi1	[length = 1]
	movl	8(%ebp), %ecx	# 41	*movsi_1/1	[length = 3]
	popl	%esi		# 50	popsi1	[length = 1]
	leave			# 51	leave	[length = 1]
	movl	%ecx, %edx	# 36	*movsi_1/1	[length = 2]
	ret			# 52	return_internal	[length = 1]

I don't know if it's your fault, but it's worse!

-- 
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-02 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-02 15:35 Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-02 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-08-03 16:41   ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-03 19:02     ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-08-02 18:52 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-08-02 19:21   ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-07  1:41     ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2007-08-07  8:29       ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-02 23:16 ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen [this message]
2007-08-03 12:03   ` Michael Matz
2007-08-03 14:34   ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-03 15:37     ` Michael Matz
2007-08-07  1:08       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-07  1:27 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2007-08-07 10:47   ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-08-08 18:40     ` Andreas Tobler
2007-08-09  7:45       ` Andreas Krebbel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070802231609.GL25795@sygehus.dk \
    --to=rask@sygehus.dk \
    --cc=Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).