public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Fix i686-linux --enable-targets=all
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806141255.GA11614@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806135141.GA31444@caradoc.them.org>

On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 06:41:28AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > It is the part of
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31868
> > 
> > and a complete patch is posted at
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00563.html
> > 
> > Could someone please review it?
> 
> I see.  I don't think your patch actually handles this case; you set
> CRTSTUFF_T_FLAGS in t-crtstuff64, but i386/t-crtstuff will be included
> afterwards, and that will set it again.  That's why I did it more

Could you tell me where i386/t-crtstuff is included after
i386/t-crtstuff64? I must have missed it.

> centrally.  The problem is the same for any target that forces
> creation of .eh_frame; my patch won't affect i386-linux crtend.o even
> though it changes the compile flags there.

-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables is turned off for i386 by default.
That is why i386's crtend.o is OK. Turning it off explicitly should
be OK. I have been using it for 3 months.

> 
> Also, I think += is preferred.

My patch is supposed to set CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS only once. += isn't
very useful.


H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-06 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-06 13:37 Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-06 13:39 ` Andrew Pinski
2007-08-06 13:41 ` H.J. Lu
2007-08-06 13:51   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-06 14:13     ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2007-08-06 14:24       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-06 14:56         ` H.J. Lu
2007-08-06 15:07           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-06 16:05         ` Paolo Bonzini
2007-08-06 16:11           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-06 16:29           ` H.J. Lu
2007-08-06 18:34 Paolo Bonzini
2007-08-06 19:53 ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070806141255.GA11614@lucon.org \
    --to=hjl@lucon.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).