From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17105 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2007 11:59:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17016 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Aug 2007 11:59:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:59:24 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FD79810B; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:59:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20DD9810A; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:59:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IOBLO-0003Ws-2R; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:59:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Jie Zhang , GCC Patches Subject: Re: Don't define USE_PT_GNU_EH_FRAME for uClibc Message-ID: <20070823115921.GA11352@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Pinski , Jie Zhang , GCC Patches References: <46CD5396.8020302@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg01538.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:31:39AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On 8/23/07, Jie Zhang wrote: > > uClibc pretends to be glibc 2.2. But currently it doesn't use > > PT_GNU_EH_FRAME segment. So we cannot define USE_PT_GNU_EH_FRAME and > > have to register and deregister frame info. > > This is wrong, it should never be pretending to be glibc. This is > just as bad as ICC pretending to be GCC. Probably true, but irrelevant to Jie's patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery