public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>,
		gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: Lazy construction of libcalls
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070908160844.GG10905@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18146.31326.53954.878500@zebedee.pink>

> Jan Hubicka writes:
>  > > Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>  > > >> Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
>  > > >> > While comparing the tables produced by new and old code, I noticed that
>  > > >> > "ffs" for SI used to be called "ffssi3" but now it is "ffs".
>  > > >> > I believe it was inteded to be called ffs because of:
>  > > >> >   optab_handler (ffs_optab, int_mode)->libfunc = init_one_libfunc ("ffs");
>  > > >> > that however later get overwriten by initialization code.
>  > > >> 
>  > > >> Actually, this was deliberate.  All libgccs have word and doubleword
>  > > >> ffs functions, but not all C libraries have "ffs".  So we wanted the
>  > > >> libgcc versions to take precedence over the C library fallback.  See:
>  > > >> 
>  > > >>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01165.html
>  > > >> 
>  > > >> for details.
>  > > >
>  > > > OK, so the initialization of libgcc always overwrite the ffs
>  > > > initialization, so simply removing the line above would work?
>  > > 
>  > > Not for 64-bit targets with a 32-bit int, since __builtin_ffs() takes
>  > > an int argument.  We could of course add an SImode libgcc function for
>  > > those targets, but the patch above was just supposed to make better
>  > > use of what we already had.
>  > 
>  > Thanks for explanation - I've now added a guard 
>  > if (INT_TYPE_SIZE < BITS_PER_WORD)
>  > into my local copy that should do what described again. I am re-testing now,
>  > OK with that change?
> 
> This breaks ARM EABI.  The symptom is that we generate signed instead
> of unsigned libcalls for a % b where a and b are usigned ints.
> 
> The problem is here in sign_expand_binop(), where we generate a fake
> optab:
> 
>   /* Try widening to a signed int.  Make a fake signed optab that
>      hides any signed insn for direct use.  */
>   wide_soptab = *soptab;
>   optab_handler (&wide_soptab, mode)->insn_code = CODE_FOR_nothing;
>  
> We later call expand_binop (mode, &wide_soptab ...  which in turn
> calls optab_libfunc (binoptab, mode) which calls optab->libcall_gen()
> and inserts the fake optab into the hash table.  This means that the
> hash table ->optab points into the stack.  We don't want to do this,
> I'm sure.

Uh, sure...
> 
> I suspect the easiest way to fix this is by setting libcall_gen to
> NULL in the fake optab.

Thanks, that seems like correct fix to me.

Honza

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-08 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-21 17:13 Jan Hubicka
2007-08-24 13:44 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-08-24 14:23   ` Jan Hubicka
2007-08-24 14:46     ` Richard Sandiford
2007-09-04  8:16       ` Jan Hubicka
2007-09-04  8:28         ` Richard Guenther
2007-09-19  6:50           ` Kaveh R. GHAZI
2007-09-28  5:48             ` [PING]: fix breakage in c4x ports Kaveh R. GHAZI
2007-10-12 13:15               ` [PING x 2]: " Kaveh R. GHAZI
2007-10-12 13:16                 ` Richard Guenther
2007-09-08 12:44         ` Lazy construction of libcalls Andrew Haley
2007-09-08 16:28           ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2007-08-24 14:43   ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070908160844.GG10905@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=richard@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).