From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16978 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2007 22:05:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16970 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Oct 2007 22:05:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:05:51 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE06981F1; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:05:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B6D980A5; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 22:05:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IdYpI-0000BZ-BB; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:05:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eric Botcazou Cc: Geoffrey Keating , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function Message-ID: <20071004220548.GA674@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eric Botcazou , Geoffrey Keating , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20071004212317.7FA2C7771263@geoffk5.apple.com> <20071004213557.GA30976@caradoc.them.org> <200710050000.32663.ebotcazou@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710050000.32663.ebotcazou@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:00:32AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > The lack of DWARF frame information sounds like the real bug. Perhaps > > in Eric's February changes on how DECL_IGNORED_P was handled for > > functions? > > If the user is supposed to able to set a breakpoint in the function, I don't > think that the function should have DECL_IGNORED_P on it. It doesn't correspond to any source... well, you could argue it either way. Anyway, shouldn't we output frame information regardless of DECL_IGNORED_P? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery