From: "Andreas Krebbel" <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
To: Michael Meissner <michael.meissner@amd.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PING] Target hook for rewriting inline asm constraints
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071107090934.GA6594@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071106181838.GA31748@mmeissner-gold.amd.com>
Hi Michael,
thanks for your review. I'll address the points you mentioned.
> Now, getting on the broader scope issues about the patch, I can sympathize with
> the desire, but I think this is really opening up a can of worms if we let the
> back end rewrite asm constraints like this. I'm also not sure I understand
> what the exact problem is. I would imagine if you have address modes that are
> allowed in some cases, but not others, this is better expressed in
> GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS instead of GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS.
In order to support new address formats there is no other way than
extending the GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS hook. All addresses not
accepted by this hook will be reloaded into a register.
The GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS tells the middle end if an address
should be interpreted depending on the mode of the memory access.
How do you think this can help me here?
Bye,
-Andreas-
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-07 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 12:54 Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 16:31 ` Tom Tromey
2007-10-31 16:43 ` Richard Guenther
2007-10-31 18:55 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 19:13 ` Richard Guenther
2007-10-31 20:40 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-04 23:05 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05 9:25 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-05 9:43 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05 10:32 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-05 11:02 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05 13:42 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-06 22:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-07 11:55 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 17:22 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 17:56 ` Tom Tromey
2007-11-06 18:20 ` Michael Meissner
2007-11-07 9:10 ` Andreas Krebbel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071107090934.GA6594@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=andreas.krebbel@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=michael.meissner@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).