public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Krebbel" <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
To: Michael Meissner <michael.meissner@amd.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PING] Target hook for rewriting inline asm constraints
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071107090934.GA6594@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071106181838.GA31748@mmeissner-gold.amd.com>

Hi Michael,

thanks for your review.  I'll address the points you mentioned.

> Now, getting on the broader scope issues about the patch, I can sympathize with
> the desire, but I think this is really opening up a can of worms if we let the
> back end rewrite asm constraints like this.  I'm also not sure I understand
> what the exact problem is.  I would imagine if you have address modes that are
> allowed in some cases, but not others, this is better expressed in
> GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS instead of GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS.

In order to support new address formats there is no other way than
extending the GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS hook.  All addresses not
accepted by this hook will be reloaded into a register.

The GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS tells the middle end if an address
should be interpreted depending on the mode of the memory access.
How do you think this can help me here?

Bye,

-Andreas-

      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-30 12:54 Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 16:31 ` Tom Tromey
2007-10-31 16:43   ` Richard Guenther
2007-10-31 18:55     ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 19:13       ` Richard Guenther
2007-10-31 20:40         ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-04 23:05           ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05  9:25             ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-05  9:43               ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05 10:32                 ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-05 11:02                   ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-05 13:42                     ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-11-06 22:00                       ` Richard Sandiford
2007-11-07 11:55                         ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 17:22   ` Andreas Krebbel
2007-10-31 17:56     ` Tom Tromey
2007-11-06 18:20 ` Michael Meissner
2007-11-07  9:10   ` Andreas Krebbel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071107090934.GA6594@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=andreas.krebbel@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=michael.meissner@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).