From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11549 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2007 12:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 11533 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2007 12:03:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk (HELO pfepc.post.tele.dk) (195.41.46.237) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:02:57 +0000 Received: from x1-6-00-0f-9f-c6-3e-90 (x1-6-00-0f-9f-c6-3e-90.k75.webspeed.dk [80.197.1.215]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BB88A0018; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:02:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from x1-6-00-0f-9f-c6-3e-90 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by x1-6-00-0f-9f-c6-3e-90 (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lB1C2qls025595; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:02:52 +0100 Received: (from rask@localhost) by x1-6-00-0f-9f-c6-3e-90 (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id lB1C2pbs025594; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:02:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:03:00 -0000 From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen To: Mark Mitchell , Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Patches , rsandifo@nildram.co.uk Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Message-ID: <20071201120251.GT17368@sygehus.dk> References: <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <20071128210420.GH17368@sygehus.dk> <474DF7E4.6050308@codesourcery.com> <20071130181424.GO17368@sygehus.dk> <4750559E.2090800@codesourcery.com> <20071130211005.GQ17368@sygehus.dk> <87d4tqu4nv.fsf@firetop.home> <20071201115252.GS17368@sygehus.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071201115252.GS17368@sygehus.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:52:52PM +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > > I'll post a patch to implement the --cache-file trick just as soon as I > figure out why the $with_newlib variable is lost sometime before configuring > libgfortran, because it seems to basicly work apart from that. Then we can > decide for 4.3 or 4.4. Correction: $with_newlib seems to be completely unavailable in the toplevel Makefile(.tpl). Any ideas? -- Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Danish law requires addresses in e-mail to be logged and stored for a year